This chart shows the Common Number Quintuplets which refers to the five specific numbers that have been drawn together more frequently or infrequently than the other quintuplet numbers.
Quintuplets | Freq. | Last Draw | |
---|---|---|---|
3 12 16 22 43 | 1 |
|
Feb-01-2025 |
9 10 17 33 45 | 1 |
|
Dec-14-2024 |
1 2 7 11 37 | 1 |
|
Apr-30-2025 |
5 20 23 24 36 | 1 |
|
Dec-25-2024 |
13 33 35 36 38 | 1 |
|
Jan-08-2025 |
2 11 15 25 43 | 1 |
|
Nov-16-2024 |
7 13 19 38 46 | 1 |
|
Oct-23-2024 |
3 13 17 23 35 | 1 |
|
Mar-05-2025 |
9 24 27 33 40 | 1 |
|
Mar-22-2025 |
1 3 8 14 19 | 1 |
|
Mar-29-2025 |
5 21 26 33 42 | 1 |
|
Dec-04-2024 |
14 15 33 38 39 | 1 |
|
Nov-09-2024 |
2 22 33 42 44 | 1 |
|
Feb-22-2025 |
7 18 37 42 43 | 1 |
|
Jan-04-2025 |
3 13 23 36 41 | 1 |
|
Oct-30-2024 |
10 13 23 29 37 | 1 |
|
Nov-30-2024 |
1 3 12 16 30 | 1 |
|
Jan-22-2025 |
6 7 17 19 44 | 1 |
|
Dec-07-2024 |
15 20 30 36 46 | 1 |
|
Feb-05-2025 |
2 24 26 30 41 | 1 |
|
Nov-20-2024 |
7 21 26 37 44 | 1 |
|
Apr-09-2025 |
3 14 29 33 47 | 1 |
|
May-31-2025 |
11 12 16 25 35 | 1 |
|
Jan-01-2025 |
1 4 12 15 28 | 1 |
|
Feb-19-2025 |
6 8 10 32 34 | 1 |
|
Apr-12-2025 |
15 21 29 37 45 | 1 |
|
Mar-12-2025 |
2 28 39 41 42 | 1 |
|
Oct-09-2024 |
8 9 33 45 46 | 1 |
|
Mar-08-2025 |
3 19 30 39 46 | 1 |
|
May-03-2025 |
11 13 18 21 44 | 1 |
|
Mar-15-2025 |
1 9 26 29 47 | 1 |
|
Feb-15-2025 |
6 11 13 24 39 | 1 |
|
Nov-02-2024 |
15 22 24 35 38 | 1 |
|
Mar-19-2025 |
3 4 5 7 35 | 1 |
|
May-24-2025 |
8 12 18 34 45 | 1 |
|
May-28-2025 |
4 5 17 19 47 | 1 |
|
Dec-18-2024 |
11 17 18 40 44 | 1 |
|
May-17-2025 |
1 13 26 30 33 | 1 |
|
Mar-26-2025 |
6 14 22 28 35 | 1 |
|
Dec-28-2024 |
16 24 38 40 45 | 1 |
|
Jun-07-2025 |
3 4 14 21 46 | 1 |
|
Apr-05-2025 |
8 14 16 21 28 | 1 |
|
Jan-15-2025 |
4 7 8 28 33 | 1 |
|
Jan-18-2025 |
11 19 24 38 41 | 1 |
|
Dec-11-2024 |
1 18 26 32 44 | 1 |
|
Mar-01-2025 |
6 19 39 42 46 | 1 |
|
May-14-2025 |
18 25 31 38 39 | 1 |
|
Oct-16-2024 |
3 5 15 16 42 | 1 |
|
Nov-27-2024 |
8 15 17 18 19 | 1 |
|
Oct-12-2024 |
4 12 16 18 34 | 1 |
|
Jun-04-2025 |
12 19 23 33 41 | 1 |
|
Apr-16-2025 |
2 6 10 13 16 | 1 |
|
Oct-02-2024 |
6 21 24 33 37 | 1 |
|
Jan-29-2025 |
19 27 29 40 45 | 1 |
|
Apr-23-2025 |
3 6 27 33 37 | 1 |
|
Dec-21-2024 |
8 23 38 40 41 | 1 |
|
May-07-2025 |
4 12 27 28 42 | 1 |
|
Jun-11-2025 |
12 29 31 37 46 | 1 |
|
Oct-19-2024 |
2 6 27 41 47 | 1 |
|
Feb-08-2025 |
7 8 13 28 33 | 1 |
|
Feb-26-2025 |
19 30 32 41 44 | 1 |
|
Nov-06-2024 |
3 7 16 39 40 | 1 |
|
Nov-23-2024 |
8 24 41 45 46 | 1 |
|
Apr-19-2025 |
4 18 36 40 44 | 1 |
|
Nov-13-2024 |
13 20 22 27 35 | 1 |
|
Feb-12-2025 |
2 8 10 36 46 | 1 |
|
Oct-26-2024 |
7 8 30 35 39 | 1 |
|
Jun-14-2025 |
20 22 28 29 45 | 1 |
|
May-21-2025 |
3 11 14 27 37 | 1 |
|
Apr-02-2025 |
8 31 33 35 42 | 1 |
|
Apr-26-2025 |
4 26 31 40 41 | 1 |
|
Jan-11-2025 |
13 20 25 32 35 | 1 |
|
Jan-25-2025 |
2 8 17 33 47 | 1 |
|
Oct-05-2024 |
7 10 11 21 32 | 1 |
|
May-10-2025 |
20 29 33 40 41 | 1 |
|
Jun-18-2025 |
Since its inception in 1986, California SuperLotto has undergone several significant format changes that have impacted the odds of winning the jackpot. Here’s a clear timeline of the California SuperLotto Plus format changes since its inception:
Period | Format | Mega Ball |
---|---|---|
October 18, 1986 | 6 numbers out of 49 | none. |
June 30, 1990 | 6 numbers out of 53 | none. |
April 29, 2000 | 5 numbers out of 47 | 1 number out of 27 |
Initially, the game followed a 6/49 format, where players selected six numbers from a pool of 49, offering odds of about 1 in 13.98 million. In 1990, the format was modified to 6/53, making it slightly more difficult to win. The most substantial change occurred in 2000 when the game was rebranded as SuperLotto Plus. The new format required players to choose five numbers from 1 to 47 and a separate Mega number from 1 to 27, shifting to a two-drum system. This overhaul increased the jackpot odds to approximately 1 in 41 million.
These format changes have a direct impact on statistical analysis. Mixing frequency data across different formats is not advisable because each version of the game has a different number pool and probability structure.
For example, a number that appeared frequently in the 5/47 format may have done so due to higher individual draw probability, but that same frequency can be misleading in the 6/49 or 6/53 formats.
Therefore, for meaningful analysis, it’s essential to treat each format as its own distinct dataset. Analyzing trends or frequencies should be restricted to results from within the same format period, especially if the goal is to inform number selection in the current game structure.