Explore updated overdue lottery numbers for the longest time based on historical and latest draw history. This analysis highlights numbers that haven’t appeared for several draws and may be statistically considered "due" for selection.
Overdue Numbers
The table below presents key metrics for analyzing overdue numbers. It includes columns for Maximum Interval, Average Interval, and Last Draw Interval, which indicate the longest gap, the average gap, and the number of draws since a number last appeared, respectively.
Two additional columns, Average Rating and Maximum Rating, offer deeper insights into recent trends. The Average Rating is calculated by dividing the last draw interval by the average interval, showing how the most recent gap compares to typical spacing. Similarly, the Maximum Rating is obtained by dividing the last draw interval by the maximum interval, providing a measure of how close the current interval is to the longest ever recorded. Together, these statistics help identify numbers that may be overdue or performing unusually based on historical patterns.
To identify lottery numbers that may be overdue, attention should be given to the column Last Draw Interval, Average Rating, and Maximum Rating. A higher Last Draw Interval value indicates that the number hasn’t been drawn in a while and could be considered overdue. If the Average Rating is greater than 1, especially significantly so, it suggests the number has gone longer than usual without being drawn. Meanwhile, a Maximum Rating value close to 1 implies that the number is nearing or exceeding its historical maximum gap, reinforcing the idea that it may be overdue. Therefore, numbers with a high last draw interval, an average rating well above 1, and a maximum rating nearing 1 are likely candidates for being considered overdue.
| Interval | Rating (Current) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ball | Max | Avg. | Last | Avg. | Max | Last Draw |
33 |
10 | 4.47 | 5 | 1.12 | 0.50 | Jun-28-2025 |
3 |
9 | 5.57 | 5 | 0.90 | 0.56 | Jun-28-2025 |
13 |
26 | 6.08 | 3 | 0.49 | 0.12 | Jul-05-2025 |
7 |
12 | 6.25 | 1 | 0.16 | 0.08 | Jul-12-2025 |
8 |
23 | 6.25 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-16-2025 |
35 |
28 | 7.45 | 3 | 0.40 | 0.11 | Jul-05-2025 |
4 |
29 | 9.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-16-2025 |
41 |
19 | 7.20 | 8 | 1.11 | 0.42 | Jun-18-2025 |
11 |
29 | 9.80 | 4 | 0.41 | 0.14 | Jul-02-2025 |
44 |
27 | 9.70 | 2 | 0.21 | 0.07 | Jul-09-2025 |
6 |
18 | 8.20 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-16-2025 |
19 |
29 | 6.90 | 7 | 1.01 | 0.24 | Jun-21-2025 |
45 |
35 | 9.89 | 7 | 0.71 | 0.20 | Jun-21-2025 |
14 |
21 | 9.33 | 2 | 0.21 | 0.10 | Jul-09-2025 |
40 |
21 | 9.22 | 8 | 0.87 | 0.38 | Jun-18-2025 |
16 |
35 | 8.56 | 5 | 0.58 | 0.14 | Jun-28-2025 |
30 |
18 | 9.11 | 4 | 0.44 | 0.22 | Jul-02-2025 |
24 |
20 | 9.11 | 11 | 1.21 | 0.55 | Jun-07-2025 |
37 |
20 | 8.33 | 2 | 0.24 | 0.10 | Jul-09-2025 |
12 |
21 | 7.89 | 6 | 0.76 | 0.29 | Jun-25-2025 |
20 |
35 | 11.25 | 3 | 0.27 | 0.09 | Jul-05-2025 |
46 |
29 | 9.38 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-16-2025 |
27 |
26 | 10.00 | 5 | 0.50 | 0.19 | Jun-28-2025 |
21 |
31 | 9.50 | 19 | 2.00 | 0.61 | May-10-2025 |
29 |
22 | 9.38 | 2 | 0.21 | 0.09 | Jul-09-2025 |
42 |
18 | 9.25 | 6 | 0.65 | 0.33 | Jun-25-2025 |
18 |
18 | 9.50 | 2 | 0.21 | 0.11 | Jul-09-2025 |
26 |
17 | 8.14 | 28 | 3.44 | 1.65 | Apr-09-2025 |
39 |
46 | 10.29 | 6 | 0.58 | 0.13 | Jun-25-2025 |
1 |
35 | 9.00 | 22 | 2.44 | 0.63 | Apr-30-2025 |
15 |
20 | 6.43 | 34 | 5.29 | 1.70 | Mar-19-2025 |
28 |
24 | 10.00 | 10 | 1.00 | 0.42 | Jun-11-2025 |
23 |
20 | 12.43 | 6 | 0.48 | 0.30 | Jun-25-2025 |
22 |
37 | 13.00 | 16 | 1.23 | 0.43 | May-21-2025 |
36 |
45 | 12.33 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.02 | Jul-12-2025 |
38 |
20 | 10.83 | 11 | 1.02 | 0.55 | Jun-07-2025 |
32 |
23 | 12.80 | 19 | 1.48 | 0.83 | May-10-2025 |
2 |
23 | 10.60 | 22 | 2.08 | 0.96 | Apr-30-2025 |
47 |
30 | 14.80 | 7 | 0.47 | 0.23 | Jun-21-2025 |
9 |
29 | 16.00 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.14 | Jul-02-2025 |
10 |
34 | 14.80 | 1 | 0.07 | 0.03 | Jul-12-2025 |
17 |
22 | 12.40 | 17 | 1.37 | 0.77 | May-17-2025 |
5 |
43 | 13.80 | 15 | 1.09 | 0.35 | May-24-2025 |
31 |
30 | 19.25 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-16-2025 |
34 |
70 | 28.33 | 12 | 0.42 | 0.17 | Jun-04-2025 |
43 |
22 | 14.67 | 47 | 3.20 | 2.14 | Feb-01-2025 |
25 |
13 | 9.67 | 49 | 5.07 | 3.77 | Jan-25-2025 |
Number Frequency by Rank
The chart below presents the frequency of numbers ranked by occurrence, with overdue numbers visually distinguished using an accent color.
| Rank | Frequency | Ball |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 |
33
|
| 2 | 14 |
3
|
| 3 | 12 |
13
7
8
|
| 4 | 11 |
35
4
|
| 5 | 10 |
41
11
44
6
19
|
| 6 | 9 |
45
14
40
16
30
24
37
12
|
| 7 | 8 |
20
46
27
21
29
42
18
|
| 8 | 7 |
26
39
1
15
28
23
|
| 9 | 6 |
22
36
38
|
| 10 | 5 |
32
2
47
9
10
17
5
|
| 11 | 4 |
31
|
| 12 | 3 |
34
43
25
|
Format Changes in California's SuperLotto
Since its inception in 1986, California SuperLotto has undergone several significant format changes that have impacted the odds of winning the jackpot. Here’s a clear timeline of the California SuperLotto Plus format changes since its inception:
| Period | Format | Mega Ball |
|---|---|---|
| October 18, 1986 | 6 numbers out of 49 | none. |
| June 30, 1990 | 6 numbers out of 53 | none. |
| April 29, 2000 | 5 numbers out of 47 | 1 number out of 27 |
Initially, the game followed a 6/49 format, where players selected six numbers from a pool of 49, offering odds of about 1 in 13.98 million. In 1990, the format was modified to 6/53, making it slightly more difficult to win. The most substantial change occurred in 2000 when the game was rebranded as SuperLotto Plus. The new format required players to choose five numbers from 1 to 47 and a separate Mega number from 1 to 27, shifting to a two-drum system. This overhaul increased the jackpot odds to approximately 1 in 41 million.
How California SuperLotto Plus Format Changes Affect Your Number Strategy.
These format changes have a direct impact on statistical analysis. Mixing frequency data across different formats is not advisable because each version of the game has a different number pool and probability structure.
For example, a number that appeared frequently in the 5/47 format may have done so due to higher individual draw probability, but that same frequency can be misleading in the 6/49 or 6/53 formats.
Therefore, for meaningful analysis, it’s essential to treat each format as its own distinct dataset. Analyzing trends or frequencies should be restricted to results from within the same format period, especially if the goal is to inform number selection in the current game structure.