Explore updated overdue lottery numbers for the longest time based on historical and latest draw history. This analysis highlights numbers that haven’t appeared for several draws and may be statistically considered "due" for selection.
Overdue Numbers
The table below presents key metrics for analyzing overdue numbers. It includes columns for Maximum Interval, Average Interval, and Last Draw Interval, which indicate the longest gap, the average gap, and the number of draws since a number last appeared, respectively.
Two additional columns, Average Rating and Maximum Rating, offer deeper insights into recent trends. The Average Rating is calculated by dividing the last draw interval by the average interval, showing how the most recent gap compares to typical spacing. Similarly, the Maximum Rating is obtained by dividing the last draw interval by the maximum interval, providing a measure of how close the current interval is to the longest ever recorded. Together, these statistics help identify numbers that may be overdue or performing unusually based on historical patterns.
To identify lottery numbers that may be overdue, attention should be given to the column Last Draw Interval, Average Rating, and Maximum Rating. A higher Last Draw Interval value indicates that the number hasn’t been drawn in a while and could be considered overdue. If the Average Rating is greater than 1, especially significantly so, it suggests the number has gone longer than usual without being drawn. Meanwhile, a Maximum Rating value close to 1 implies that the number is nearing or exceeding its historical maximum gap, reinforcing the idea that it may be overdue. Therefore, numbers with a high last draw interval, an average rating well above 1, and a maximum rating nearing 1 are likely candidates for being considered overdue.
| Interval | Rating (Current) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ball | Max | Avg. | Last | Avg. | Max | Last Draw |
18 |
23 | 4.47 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-10-2025 |
15 |
15 | 4.00 | 3 | 0.75 | 0.20 | Jul-07-2025 |
42 |
29 | 5.33 | 2 | 0.38 | 0.07 | Jul-08-2025 |
38 |
14 | 4.24 | 3 | 0.71 | 0.21 | Jul-07-2025 |
26 |
14 | 4.59 | 1 | 0.22 | 0.07 | Jul-09-2025 |
32 |
14 | 5.31 | 3 | 0.56 | 0.21 | Jul-07-2025 |
2 |
15 | 4.69 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-10-2025 |
20 |
17 | 4.87 | 2 | 0.41 | 0.12 | Jul-08-2025 |
25 |
23 | 5.43 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.04 | Jul-09-2025 |
19 |
15 | 5.36 | 1 | 0.19 | 0.07 | Jul-09-2025 |
28 |
16 | 5.36 | 2 | 0.37 | 0.13 | Jul-08-2025 |
41 |
17 | 5.57 | 3 | 0.54 | 0.18 | Jul-07-2025 |
35 |
16 | 4.79 | 10 | 2.09 | 0.63 | Jun-30-2025 |
5 |
16 | 5.07 | 6 | 1.18 | 0.38 | Jul-04-2025 |
12 |
23 | 6.15 | 6 | 0.98 | 0.26 | Jul-04-2025 |
33 |
56 | 9.62 | 5 | 0.52 | 0.09 | Jul-05-2025 |
8 |
16 | 5.85 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-10-2025 |
40 |
16 | 5.85 | 3 | 0.51 | 0.19 | Jul-07-2025 |
34 |
14 | 5.62 | 2 | 0.36 | 0.14 | Jul-08-2025 |
24 |
13 | 5.92 | 4 | 0.68 | 0.31 | Jul-06-2025 |
37 |
22 | 6.54 | 4 | 0.61 | 0.18 | Jul-06-2025 |
13 |
21 | 6.08 | 4 | 0.66 | 0.19 | Jul-06-2025 |
10 |
25 | 7.50 | 1 | 0.13 | 0.04 | Jul-09-2025 |
16 |
24 | 6.91 | 1 | 0.14 | 0.04 | Jul-09-2025 |
36 |
27 | 6.64 | 6 | 0.90 | 0.22 | Jul-04-2025 |
17 |
14 | 6.27 | 10 | 1.59 | 0.71 | Jun-30-2025 |
30 |
13 | 6.64 | 5 | 0.75 | 0.38 | Jul-05-2025 |
39 |
29 | 7.50 | 8 | 1.07 | 0.28 | Jul-02-2025 |
21 |
21 | 7.10 | 5 | 0.70 | 0.24 | Jul-05-2025 |
9 |
20 | 7.50 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-10-2025 |
23 |
17 | 7.60 | 8 | 1.05 | 0.47 | Jul-02-2025 |
4 |
22 | 6.40 | 14 | 2.19 | 0.64 | Jun-26-2025 |
7 |
25 | 8.67 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-10-2025 |
14 |
23 | 8.89 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-10-2025 |
27 |
24 | 7.67 | 7 | 0.91 | 0.29 | Jul-03-2025 |
44 |
21 | 9.13 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.14 | Jul-07-2025 |
6 |
43 | 11.25 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.02 | Jul-09-2025 |
1 |
20 | 10.13 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Jul-10-2025 |
22 |
31 | 9.63 | 8 | 0.83 | 0.26 | Jul-02-2025 |
3 |
17 | 9.50 | 2 | 0.21 | 0.12 | Jul-08-2025 |
11 |
9 | 6.13 | 29 | 4.73 | 3.22 | Jun-11-2025 |
31 |
21 | 8.75 | 5 | 0.57 | 0.24 | Jul-05-2025 |
43 |
20 | 10.14 | 15 | 1.48 | 0.75 | Jun-25-2025 |
29 |
28 | 12.33 | 7 | 0.57 | 0.25 | Jul-03-2025 |
Based on the statistics, the following numbers appear to be overdue: 35, 5, 17, 39, 23, 4, 11, 43. These numbers have not appeared for a longer period than their average interval. Numbers such as 35, 17, 4, 11 have a high average rating, meaning they have exceeded their typical appearance rate by over 50%. Additionally, numbers like 11 have reached or surpassed their historical maximum interval, suggesting a high likelihood of appearing soon.
Format Changes in Australia's Set For Life Lottery
Since its inception in August 2015, Australia's Set for Life lottery has undergone significant changes to enhance gameplay and increase winning opportunities.
| Period | Format | Supplementary Nos. |
|---|---|---|
| August 2015 - March 22, 2020 | 8 numbers from a pool of 37 (8/37) | 2 numbers from the same pool. |
| March 23, 2020 - Present | 7 numbers from a pool of 44 (7/44) | 2 number from the same pool |
Since its launch in August 2015, the Australian Set for Life lottery has undergone notable changes aimed at improving gameplay and enhancing player experience. Initially, players were required to select 8 numbers from a pool of 1 to 37. Each draw produced 8 winning numbers and 2 supplementary numbers.
On March 23, 2020, significant revisions were introduced. The format changed to selecting 7 numbers from a larger pool of 1 to 44, and each draw now produces 7 winning numbers and 2 supplementary numbers. The number of prize divisions expanded to eight, with players now able to win a prize by matching as few as 3 main numbers and 1 supplementary number. These changes also improved the overall odds of winning a prize, shifting from 1 in 59 to 1 in 50. Overall, the modifications were designed to create more frequent and appealing prize opportunities for participants.
How Australia's Set for Life Lotto Format Changes Affect Your Number Strategy.
These format changes have a direct impact on statistical analysis. Mixing frequency data across different formats is not advisable because each version of the game has a different number pool and probability structure.
For example, a number that appeared less frequently in the 8/37 format may have done so due to lower individual draw probability, but that same frequency can be misleading in the 7/44 formats.
Therefore, for meaningful analysis, it’s essential to treat each format as its own distinct dataset. Analyzing trends or frequencies should be restricted to results from within the same format period, especially if the goal is to inform number selection in the current game structure.